How are Pets Treated Upon Divorce or Separation?

Divorcing or separated couples often seek legal advice on a variety of issues, like as child custody, property division, and financial concerns. What happens to the family pet, however, may be the most emotionally charged subject for a lot of individuals. Conflicts may emerge around who gets to retain the pet, who will foot the bill for its upkeep, and where the creature will reside following the split.

The Law Regarding Pets

In England and Wales, where they are legally classified as “chattels,” much like a television or painting, pets are regarded as personal property. Unlike children, pets are not given any particular protections under UK law. Although this designation may seem disrespectful to many who view their pets as members of the family, the law may not share this sentiment.

When adjudicating pet-related issues, judges generally take into account the following factors:

• The person who made the purchase of the pet might be more entitled to keep it.
• In most cases, the person who received a gift of a pet is regarded as the owner.
• The microchip details and whose name the pet is registered under can play a significant role.

Financial Responsibility

The person responsible for providing the pet’s food, insurance, and veterinary care may be examined by the court.

Financial Stability

The person who can afford to care for the pet can have the upper hand.

Living Conditions

Where the pet will live most comfortably will be determined by how suitable each party’s home setting is.

The method used by the court is frequently comparable to how other assets are handled, with the expense and difficulty of litigation being a major factor. Even while the emotional connection between a pet and its owners is acknowledged, ownership and pragmatic concerns continue to take center stage.

Possible Court Outcomes

There are a few probable outcomes if the pet conflict goes to court:

• The ownership or pedigree documents may be transferred from one party to the other by an order from the court.
• The total amount of the parties’ financial settlement may include the expenditures of pet care, according to the court.
• The court may occasionally mandate shared custody of the animal, with each owner paying a portion of the expenses of upkeep.

It’s crucial to remember, though, that family courts typically do not give priority to minor disagreements, especially when there are more urgent matters at hand, such child custody or the split of large financial assets.

Avoiding Court – Alternatives to Litigation

Before taking a pet disagreement to court, it’s advisable to consider these options because litigation may be expensive and time-consuming:

●       Prenuptial or Cohabitation Agreements

Pet ownership clauses can be included in a prenuptial or cohabitation agreement between a couple. These contracts can define who owns the pet and include instructions for taking care of it in the event of a separation.

●       Informal Agreements

Strive to come to an informal pet arrangement if the partnership fails. If there are kids involved, the pet might go from house to house with the kids.

●       Mediation

If a non-formal agreement cannot be reached, think about mediation with a professional who specializes in issues involving pets.

●       Negotiated Agreement via Solicitors

If mediation fails, attorneys can help negotiate a settlement, potentially avoiding the need for legal action.

●       Arbitration

For a quicker resolution, arbitration might be employed in place of court proceedings. It is less formal and binding than a court.

●       Court Proceedings

Court cases may be pursued as a last option. This approach, however, is expensive, time-consuming, and can produce a conclusion that neither party is happy with.

Should Pets Be Treated More Like Children?

In custody battles, judges are now taking the welfare of dogs into account, seeing them as more than simply property. This change recognizes the psychological, emotional, and physical effects that pets have on their owners, indicating that similar considerations could be beneficial for UK law. Pets can be quite important in divorce processes, even though children are usually the main focus of these proceedings. This is especially true if there are no children involved or if the pets become a source of emotional leverage.

The case for giving pets more deference in court cases is becoming stronger as they become more and more like members of the family. For the time being, however, courts in Wales and England still regard animals as property, even though there is some allowance for acknowledging their special significance in a family’s life.

For further advice please get in touch with our team today by calling 020 8538 0182 or +44 7857 809932, or you can email us on [email protected].

Please note these blogs are to enhance your knowledge and are not tailored advice, for specific advice please get in touch with our outstanding team.