Parental Alienation in Child Arrangements Proceedings

Family conflicts may be quite complicated and emotionally charged, especially when kids are involved. Sometimes, the parent that the child resides with (commonly referred to as the resident parent) will forbid the youngster from having any contact at all with the other parent.

As a result, the non-resident parent may accuse the other parent of alienating the child, which is a severe matter that could have a significant impact on the child’s connection with both parents as well as the dynamics of the family as a whole.

What is Parental Alienation?

Parental alienation can take many forms, but generally speaking, it describes actions taken by one parent with the intention of sabotaging or undermining the child’s relationship with the other parent. There is no legally defined definition for this term. “An ongoing pattern of negative attitudes and communication about the other parent or carer that have the potential or intention to undermine or even destroy the child’s relationship with their other parent or carer” is one of the alienating behaviors, according to the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass).

These actions can take many different forms, like defaming the other parent, restricting the child’s interactions with them, or even coercing the youngster into unjustifiably fearing or rejecting them. The psychological effects on the youngster may be severe, resulting in long-term problems with developing healthy connections as well as disorientation and mental pain.

Instructing an Expert

The judge may determine that a fact-finding hearing is required to determine the veracity of parental alienation charges when they are presented to the court. Family Procedure Rules (FPR) 25 allow the court to allow the instruction of an expert, like a psychologist, to help with this procedure. The expert’s job is to evaluate the circumstances, report to the court on their conclusions, and suggest the best course of action.

It is crucial to remember that an expert’s opinion is not binding on the parties involved. The court, more especially the judge who will carefully analyze all relevant evidence, is ultimately in charge of finding the facts and rendering conclusions. The expert’s report is only one component of the picture and shouldn’t be the only thing used to sway the court’s judgment, even though it may be useful.

In order to assess the effects of the alienation on the kid, the court may mandate further reports if it finds that the accusations of alienating behavior are true. A Section 7 or 37 report, which offers more suggestions for the kid’s wellbeing and suitable child arrangements, may be one of these.

Can the Child Join the Proceedings?

It could also be important to think about whether the child should be included in the legal process when there is parental alienation. A joinder application under FPR 16.4 may be used to do this, and it would entail designating a guardian to act in the child’s best interests.

It is important to consider carefully before adding a child as a party to the proceedings since doing so may complicate and prolong the legal process. But in circumstances when the child’s opinion and voice are thought to be important to the result, a guardian can be extremely helpful in making sure that the child’s wellbeing always comes first. As usual, the court will consider the child’s best interests while determining whether to approve the joinder application.

What Orders to Expect?

It’s important for the non-resident parent to control their expectations about what might come out of child arrangements orders, particularly if the court determines that the resident parent has acted in an alienating manner. It’s critical to realize that the court does not punish the resident parent for their behavior; instead, it prioritizes the child’s welfare.

Therefore, if the court determines that it is in the kid’s best interests, they may elect to keep the child living with the resident parent even in cases when parental alienation is demonstrated. The child’s desire for stability, their present living situation, and their educational background will all be considered.

In order to support continued contact between the kid and the non-resident parent while preserving the child’s stability, the court may grant “live-with” and “contact-with” orders. For example, as the child’s relationship with the non-resident parent is restored, the court may decide to impose monitored contact or progressively expand contact over time.

Conclusion

Parental alienation is a severe problem that can negatively impact a child’s emotional and mental health for a long time. The court’s job in child arrangements proceedings is to carefully consider all available information, including professional opinions and the child’s requests, in order to make choices that put the kid’s best interests first. It is essential for parents engaged in these types of conflicts to comprehend the intricacies of parental alienation and the legal system in order to handle these difficult circumstances.

For further advice please get in touch with our team today by calling 020 8538 0182 or +44 7857 809932, or you can email us on [email protected].

Please note these blogs are to enhance your knowledge and are not tailored advice, for specific advice please get in touch with our outstanding team.